The Mind Killer Defense. Discover An All Natural Treatment That Can Potentially Stop Alzheimers Symptoms Dead In Their Tracks. The Mind Killer Defense.
 |
| Practice the Meta Model, Milton Model and Mind Lines Patterns with NLP ... |
The Mind Killer Defense.
Discover An All Natural Treatment That Can Potentially Stop Alzheimers Symptoms Dead In Their Tracks.
The Mind Killer Defense.
 |
| Thinkabout your stress goingaway. |
 |
| ... enhance immune function banish anxiety and speed athletes recovery |
 |
| Your Personal Astrology Report Download your-personal-astrology-report ... |
 |
| SCHS-CB Self Improvement Hypnosis Life Coaching Download super ... |
Source : http://imentalhealth.net/mental-health-disorders/cognitive-disorders/the-mind-killer-defense
Related video about The Mind Killer Defense.
FAKEstinians are the real baby-killers and mind-thieves
FAKEstinians are the real baby-killers and mind-thieves 100 proof that Palestinians use picture of Israeli baby that they murdered in a propaganda film as if she was Palestinian baby killed by IDF The Mind Killer Defense.
Commonly question about The Mind Killer Defense.
Question :
It s not a First Amendment question here. The clown can be a clown, and the Constitution protects him fully unless he acts with specific intent to cause a specific intentional homicide -- like the death of Dr. Tiller. who was called a Baby killer, and a man with blood on his hands. The radio clown is similar to a professional wrestler who gets physically tossed out of the ring and lands on somebody in the audience causing injury. Nobody would imagine that the wrestler should be sued for the injury. The radio clown is similarly situated.
But the people who set up the arena, and the ring, and the chairs for the audience, and who charged admission, or sold advertising so they could make a profit on the professional wrestling exhibit -- they might have some liability, don t you think?
And the publishers or broadcasters of Radio Clown remarks that foreseeably could get a specific individual to be the target of public rage and anger -- and then that guy later gets shot in his church, standing there as an usher -- yes it seems like a case that should go to the jury, first to decide if there s adequate evidence of causation, and second to decide if there s adequate evidence of liability (duty, breach of duty, proximate cause, and damages).
Tiller s family may or may not have a cause of action for wrongful death against a corporate defendant who presented to millions of people in the general public the hateful remarks of a shock jock exercising what are arguably his Constitutional rights. If the station had reason to know or the suspect that they might be contributing to the possibility of harm to Dr Tiller, it would seem that a jury should have a chance to make the determinations of what the facts are under the law as it applies to incitement, and accessory before the fact to a wrongful death. Heaven forfend we should ever put a muzzle on any radio clowns -- but the people that hire them, and write their paychecks, should perhaps be held to some accountability for the foreseeable consequences of their editorial judgments, and actual on-air presentations. A man a dead. Justice should be done. Supposedly we have a civilized country here -- one that we are trying to hold up to the world as an example for how other nations should behave and administer their laws. All opinions are welcome -- they don t have to agree with my initial "take" on this matter. Tell me what you really think. My mind is not empty, but it is open. I m ready to give the kudo to the best opinion, and possibly to re-arrange some of my own thinking on this matter if you have a well reasoned view that seems more ethical than my own and more just. Legal citations are not required, but would be welcome, and if they are disposative, factored in. Imagine you are the trial judge. The defense has moved to dismiss on a summary judgement motion (the facts being what they are and stipulated by all parties). What is your opinion "Your Honor"?
If a radio shock jock says that a man is a killer with blood on hands, and the man is shot, is there liability?
Putting aside the issue of the radio clown s potential liability, I just want to know if the commercial producer, presenter, publisher of the radio clown s comments has any possible liability?It s not a First Amendment question here. The clown can be a clown, and the Constitution protects him fully unless he acts with specific intent to cause a specific intentional homicide -- like the death of Dr. Tiller. who was called a Baby killer, and a man with blood on his hands. The radio clown is similar to a professional wrestler who gets physically tossed out of the ring and lands on somebody in the audience causing injury. Nobody would imagine that the wrestler should be sued for the injury. The radio clown is similarly situated.
But the people who set up the arena, and the ring, and the chairs for the audience, and who charged admission, or sold advertising so they could make a profit on the professional wrestling exhibit -- they might have some liability, don t you think?
And the publishers or broadcasters of Radio Clown remarks that foreseeably could get a specific individual to be the target of public rage and anger -- and then that guy later gets shot in his church, standing there as an usher -- yes it seems like a case that should go to the jury, first to decide if there s adequate evidence of causation, and second to decide if there s adequate evidence of liability (duty, breach of duty, proximate cause, and damages).
Tiller s family may or may not have a cause of action for wrongful death against a corporate defendant who presented to millions of people in the general public the hateful remarks of a shock jock exercising what are arguably his Constitutional rights. If the station had reason to know or the suspect that they might be contributing to the possibility of harm to Dr Tiller, it would seem that a jury should have a chance to make the determinations of what the facts are under the law as it applies to incitement, and accessory before the fact to a wrongful death. Heaven forfend we should ever put a muzzle on any radio clowns -- but the people that hire them, and write their paychecks, should perhaps be held to some accountability for the foreseeable consequences of their editorial judgments, and actual on-air presentations. A man a dead. Justice should be done. Supposedly we have a civilized country here -- one that we are trying to hold up to the world as an example for how other nations should behave and administer their laws. All opinions are welcome -- they don t have to agree with my initial "take" on this matter. Tell me what you really think. My mind is not empty, but it is open. I m ready to give the kudo to the best opinion, and possibly to re-arrange some of my own thinking on this matter if you have a well reasoned view that seems more ethical than my own and more just. Legal citations are not required, but would be welcome, and if they are disposative, factored in. Imagine you are the trial judge. The defense has moved to dismiss on a summary judgement motion (the facts being what they are and stipulated by all parties). What is your opinion "Your Honor"?
Answer :
I doubt that he is legally responsible in any way.
But ethically and morally, he was an accomplice to this horrendous crime.
Hate radio spews hate. That s what it is intended for and that s what it does. Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluding themselves.
You will NEVER see any of those clowns learn their lesson; they have no remorse for anything they do or say.
Godspeed, Dr. Tiller.
I doubt that he is legally responsible in any way.
But ethically and morally, he was an accomplice to this horrendous crime.
Hate radio spews hate. That s what it is intended for and that s what it does. Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluding themselves.
You will NEVER see any of those clowns learn their lesson; they have no remorse for anything they do or say.
Godspeed, Dr. Tiller.
Question :
Killer Gets Life Sentence Plus Pizza In Plea Deal
PORTLAND, Ore. - A New York man who pleaded guilty to murder in Oregon in exchange for buckets of fried chicken will get calzones and pizza to go with his life sentence.
Tremayne Durham, 33, of New York City, admitted last month that he fatally shot Adam Calbreath, 39, of Gresham, in June 2006. Durham wanted to sell ice cream and ordered an $18,000 truck from an Oregon company. He later changed his mind, but the company wouldn t provide a refund.
The would-be ice cream man came to Oregon and killed Calbreath, a former employee of the company, while looking for its owner, authorities said.
Durham agreed to plead guilty to murder but only if he could get a break from jail food. The judge agreed and granted Durham a feast of KFC chicken, Popeye s chicken, mashed potatoes, coleslaw, carrot cake and ice cream.
After Wednesday s sentencing, Durham was to get the rest of the deal calzones, lasagna, pizza and ice cream, his defense attorney confirmed. They will pay the tab.
Durham also got married Wednesday in a civil ceremony at the Portland courthouse. The wedding to Vanessa Davis, 48, also of New York City, was not part of the plea deal that will give Durham a chance for parole after 30 years.
Deputy District Attorney Josh Lamborn said Multnomah County Judge Eric Bergstrom made the right call in allowing the unusual plea agreement because it saved the expense of a trial and possible appeals.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080807/ap_o
How could you trade a human life for a pizza?
This is just so disturbing to me.Killer Gets Life Sentence Plus Pizza In Plea Deal
PORTLAND, Ore. - A New York man who pleaded guilty to murder in Oregon in exchange for buckets of fried chicken will get calzones and pizza to go with his life sentence.
Tremayne Durham, 33, of New York City, admitted last month that he fatally shot Adam Calbreath, 39, of Gresham, in June 2006. Durham wanted to sell ice cream and ordered an $18,000 truck from an Oregon company. He later changed his mind, but the company wouldn t provide a refund.
The would-be ice cream man came to Oregon and killed Calbreath, a former employee of the company, while looking for its owner, authorities said.
Durham agreed to plead guilty to murder but only if he could get a break from jail food. The judge agreed and granted Durham a feast of KFC chicken, Popeye s chicken, mashed potatoes, coleslaw, carrot cake and ice cream.
After Wednesday s sentencing, Durham was to get the rest of the deal calzones, lasagna, pizza and ice cream, his defense attorney confirmed. They will pay the tab.
Durham also got married Wednesday in a civil ceremony at the Portland courthouse. The wedding to Vanessa Davis, 48, also of New York City, was not part of the plea deal that will give Durham a chance for parole after 30 years.
Deputy District Attorney Josh Lamborn said Multnomah County Judge Eric Bergstrom made the right call in allowing the unusual plea agreement because it saved the expense of a trial and possible appeals.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080807/ap_o
Answer :
This is hilarious. Where do you find this stuff? I think everyone was sniffing glue in the courtroom when this decision was made. That dude is just used to being in jail. It could not have been his first time. The word of the day is INSTITUTIONALIZATION!
This is hilarious. Where do you find this stuff? I think everyone was sniffing glue in the courtroom when this decision was made. That dude is just used to being in jail. It could not have been his first time. The word of the day is INSTITUTIONALIZATION!
Question :
Brought to you by the "debates not wars club" and so as to say : FREEDOM CALLS.
Also by in part sponsored by the "bombs for books campaign". And referenced by "the guns for guitars campaign".
www.worldvision.20fr.com
I d rather sell "bomb seiten" and "killer sodas" at the debate rather than sell bombs that immobilize children, cappish. (I hope you can catch the "bomb" slang) WAV
Why would anyone in their right mind be against a DEBATE under these conditions?(to settle the issues)?
I saw on CNN that IRAN wanted to have a debate with the USA. That s what "diplomacy" on some levels is all about, right? Why would that commentator say it was a silly idea? Is he a confused commentator? Perhaps he(the commentator) is like the administrators of the USA looney bin systems.... all messed up..... with their inability to see a clear route for peace. I don t know maybe they are all working for the DEFENSE contractors and they d rather sell more bombs and missiles as compared to books.Brought to you by the "debates not wars club" and so as to say : FREEDOM CALLS.
Also by in part sponsored by the "bombs for books campaign". And referenced by "the guns for guitars campaign".
www.worldvision.20fr.com
I d rather sell "bomb seiten" and "killer sodas" at the debate rather than sell bombs that immobilize children, cappish. (I hope you can catch the "bomb" slang) WAV
Answer :
There are truths neither side knows. EAch side has grounded itself in yesterdays falsehoods. Anyone who ventures to shed any light on some of what s goiing on is shushed fast, because truth is outside conventionally approved belief..
The talk might do some good.
There are truths neither side knows. EAch side has grounded itself in yesterdays falsehoods. Anyone who ventures to shed any light on some of what s goiing on is shushed fast, because truth is outside conventionally approved belief..
The talk might do some good.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar